Nominet listens to its activists – Sense prevails

Click to search!

UPDATE PM February 28 – Brands2Life have been in touch and informed us that ” although not labelled as a press release, Nominet did distribute a statement for this announcement to all media in the same way a normal press release would have been.”

Well let’s hope that the message reaches ALL the stakeholders and public!

 

We should, in the interests of fairness disclose that we did receive just before midday Nominet’s email “Update on direct.uk” with this header!

UPDATE AM February 28

We are disappointed to see that Nominet‘s announcement remains solely as a News release on their site & unsurprisingly has not been picked up by the “media”. A search on Nominet items in the last 24 hours is, how should we say, derisory on the results front.

With it’s “Public Interest” remit (with the associated 43 million internet users) and to more widely inform its 10 million direct stakeholders surely a Press release is required.

Brands2Life (a leading PR & Digital agency) organised the October 1 Press release announcing the launch of the consultation with the headline “Nominet consults on one of the most significant developments for the UK internet“. Surely the results of that consultation have at least equal significance!

*                                                                      *                                                             *

Nominet have just announced at least a delay and, we think, some commonsense reconsideration of their direct .uk proposals.

The Nominet opening sentence is:

“Following our Board meeting yesterday, we are not proceeding with our original proposal on ‘direct.uk’ but we will respond to feedback by looking at whether a revised proposal will address issues raised in the recent consultation.” 

The issues raised which Nominet intends addressing are stated to be principally the following:

“As a result, we are going to explore whether it is possible to present a revised proposal that meets the principles of increasing trust and security and maintaining the relevance of the .uk proposition in a changing landscape.

Over the coming months, this work will explore:
  • A revised phased release mechanism based largely on the prior registrations of domains in existing third levels within .uk and in which contention between different applicants for the same domain name should be reduced or eliminated.
  • Measures to improve security across the whole of the .uk namespace. This would include increased focus on encouraging the adoption of DNSSEC.
  • A firm focus on registrant verification and some form of UK presence.
  • Further investigations into the impact on the SME sector.
  • An appropriate pricing model.”

In addition to their announcement ” …feedback from the consultation has been published in two sections:

  1. an overall summary produced by the .uk policy secretariat and
  2. an analysis of the data by Nomensa.”

We have now taken down our “no no minet re direct.uk” banner as this is exactly what Nominet say they intend doing. But for the aficionados we will retain a link to our and the other published responses we located!

Whilst we have criticised Nominet’s  proposals it is apparent that they have taken account of the feedback and appear to be embarking on a sensible reconsideration.

A further consultation taking place on a revised set of proposals is rather a daunting prospect.  We do though urge Nominet to use their best endeavours to involve directly in that process a greater number of their stakeholders.  We regard the 99 attendees at their nine public meetings offered to them (one of which we understand was cancelled) and the 900 ish consultation responses to be a very inadequate reflection of their 10 million direct stakeholders (ie .uk domain registrants).

Additionally we believe their wider stakeholders the UK internet using community in the UK (over 43 million according to the latest ONS figures) deserve to be involved and informed by an appropriate online and mainstream media advertising campaign.

In closing we at I.co.uk would like to thank all respondent’s to the consultation and others who may have influenced the decision – WELL DONE EVERYBODY!

Redirect.uk call as Nominet fail to engage its Stakeholders

Click to see our response (pages 10-15 contain most of our contribution)

The Nominet consultation closed sometime yesterday either at “close of business” or maybe around midnight when we guess their Online Form by Survey Gizmo stopped accepting inputs. Their business hours cease at 6pm and by 6.04pm we had received an automated email from their .uk Policy Secretariat saying it was all over! Whatever! We sense sighs of relief, all round, at their HQ in Oxford!

They did put up a final reminder yesterday on their website but it had no links to any of the differing  ways to respond and whilst the first sentence was in the present tense by the third it was all history “.. this process has been very helpful ….” It did update the responses received figure from 650 on 18 December saying that they had now “…..received more than 850 formal responses” so unlike their new domain registrations over the holiday season (which tend to collapse) the response rate actually improved!

BUT at  0.0083% of their principal stakeholders (their 10,276,759 domain registrants) it is numerically pitiful and gives them no mandate for change irrespective of the responses content.

The executives remit from the Board was “ … that as many stakeholder views as possible be gathered in order to properly inform any decision.”  We don’t believe that reasonable efforts have been made by them, in particular in that:

  1. They did not contact directly all registrants (their principal stakeholders) to inform them of the consultation using the contact details available to them1
  2. The wider members of the Internet Community (UK internet users) of whom there are over 40 million were not informed of the consultation using either online or mainstream media advertising campaigns.

This is the main thrust of our response to the consultation (pdf). In the pdf we’ve used Nominet’s (slightly faded) purple to indicate their content and traditional black for our responses!. We have done a little redaction and added a date in the About You section. Pages 10-15 contain most of our response. We apologise for its general inelegance and any inadvertent errors or omissions but, we maintain, this is due to the rather cumbersome methodology used by Nominet in gathering their responses. There was a horrendous amount of copying involved!

In addition to the above points we are also vehemently opposed to Registered Trademark holders having any prior rights over existing domain registrants and believe if ANY .uk issue takes place it should only go to existing domain name registrants.

We thought describing the Nominet phraseology  “Domain names registered in the third level may constitute an unregistered right” as oxymoronic was particularly appropriate and considered adding something about an omnishambolic process but decided that was a step too far!

If any other respondent out there would like a platform to publish their full response (with minimalist About You only redaction) then subject to our review we would be happy to do that with a brief (200-300 words max say) summary. We will also keep an eye out for other published responses to link to.

Use the Contact form, Comments facility or DM us on twitter if you would like to follow this up.

We can, already, boast that we have published over 0.1% of all the responses!

1 We also just picked up this little snippet from an old release concerning the Short Domain consultation Nominet undertook back in 2010 prior to an issue relating to a little over 2,800 short domains.  “Nominet also wrote to the holders of approximately 20,000 trademarks corresponding to the character sets potentially subject to release ……” So they contacted directly 20,000 POTENTIAL stakeholders as part of that consultation but not the ACTUAL 10,276,759 stakeholders this go round. hmmmmmmm

A further point on the non uniqueness of registered trademarks can now be derived from the short domains release. We calculate from our information that in the short domain release there were 727 names (ie strings) such as 1-9 a, b, c etc so on average per name/string there were over 27 registered trademarks. This is one of the reasons we vehemently oppose, and perhaps goes some way to explaining Nominet’s preference for, giving registered trademark holders prior rights!

UPDATE – LINKS TO CERTAIN PUBLISHED RESPONSES

Alex Bligh

Andrews & Arnold Ltd

BCS The Chartered Institute for IT

CHIS children’s charities’ coalition on internet safety

ICO Information Commissioners Office

Open Source Consortium

Open Rights Group

Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP)

Stephen Wilde

The Internet Society (ISOC)

UCISA Universities and Colleges Information Systems Association

The 3:11:61 Predictions!

For the mathematicians amongst you these are the prime factors of 2013!

So after much peering into the rather cloudy corporate crystal ball we think we can foresee:

  1. iPad Mini’s outselling iPad (Maxi’s) by a 60/40 ratio & new updates arriving (sooner) for the Mini and (rather later) for the Maxi.
  2. Kindle Fire and Nexus tablets battling it out for second place, to you know who, in the global marketplace throughout the year with the Microsoft Surface making little impact achieving a market share well below 5%
  3. Tablet sales closing on desktops, laptops etc numerically but not overtaking them. Most netbooks will disappear
  4. Apple’s market share for tablets being below 50% for the year
  5. Apple introducing both an iWatch and a (proper) TV in the second half of the year which will not be called the iTV
  6. Apple selling over 150 million iPhones whilst Windows phones won’t!
  7. Nook divorcing totally from Barnes & Noble gaining further additional shareholders over and above the historic Microsoft (16.8%) and the newly announced Pearson (5%)  who will exercise their option taking them up to 10%
  8. Mobile internet access overtaking fixed access during the year with “mobile” becoming the most used word on the internet followed closely by “things”!
  9. Twitter not having an IPO but may add tablets other than the iPad to its (rather Applecentric) log out screen!
  10. Some of ICANN‘s new gTLD’s being used during the year but not causing general disruption.
  11. Nominet quietly shelving their direct.uk proposals but introducing a set of additional features for their third level domains with .uk New registrations in the year being around 1.75 million
  12. England retaining the Ashes in the UK & being well on the way to  completing the rout in Australia by 31 December.
  13. UK overall rainfall in 2013 being less than the 1981-2010 average of 1,154mm and well below this years near record of over 1,330 mm. That’s a staggering 4 foot 4 inches in old money! (Updated 3 January – unbelievably last year was only the second wettest year ever at 1330.7 mm v’s 2000′s 1337.3 – we demand a recount!)

Now for a very brief review of our 2012 predictions which might be summarised as consisting of some mini successes, many 10” failures and omissions a plenty!

With a bit of poetic licence and wearing our corporate rose tinted  3D glasses we reckon we had a  success rate of around 33%. [Room for improvement here - ed.]

Mini successes were iPad 2 & 3 continuing to be sold alongside one another and .uk registrations being less than 2 million. We also reckon we were half right in three other cases!

Anyway onwards & upwards!

A gTLD lottery and an internet champion

UPDATE December 18 – The results are in and MICROSOFT (475) wins ahead of  SAMSUNG (671) and APPLE (948) with AMAZON (1,156) and GOOGLE (1,545) well down the field.

ICANN‘s new gTLD prioritisation draw (provisional ) results (pdf).

On a local note CYMRU (244) was way ahead of WALES (807) pushing SCOT (1,453) down into third place!

ICANN are holding a, what we regard as rather bizarre, draw at 1pm PST ( 9pm GMT) today amongst the 1930 applicants for the new gTLD’s. They say it “ … is an equitable and fair way to order the release of initial evaluation results for all new gTLD applications. The Draw will determine the order by which applications move through the remaining stages of the program.”

Here’s a listing (and the current status) of the 1,930 applications ranging from Amazon (bit of a dispute already brewing here) through Cymru/ Wales (being organised by our very own Nominet who have a rather choice consultation on the Celtic addition(s )) to WTF. Bit of poetic licence has been adopted as  the first and last are actually AAAand Zulu! If you are of a statistical bent they also have included some fairly helpful analyses.

Unsurprisingly the objection period has been extended by a couple of months to March 2013. So there’s still time if you want to participate!

The prioritisation draw is being streamed live and once available  we will add it here a little nearer the time!

UPDATE 8 pm GMT

Live streaming by Ustream

Age Concern are running their  fourth Internet Champion of the Year Competition and entries are required by 10 January 2013. Full details are here.

Here’s their video

.

We of course have our very own Prize draw re Nominets other consultation on the .UK domainspace which we encourage you to enter.

Here are a couple of recent Guardian Media Network articles on this topic (and a comment – with possibly another on the way)!

Phil Kingsland is Nominet’s Director of (ie he is not a main board director) Marketing and Communications

Weak registrations in October – dotuk domain cliff approaches as new Nominet COO/Director appointed

Click to enlarge

This may be an exclusive! The only Nominet  source for new registrations, following their cessation of publication of detailed .uk domain registration figures from September, is their Board Meeting “Communiqué”. The November version, allegedly, published yesterday has been unavailable since last night. We of course have informed them. We hope Eleanor Bradley their newly appointed Chief Operating Officer and main board Director has a good eye for detail as we do tend to come across these sort of glitches on a rather regular basis. Just in case its availability status is updated (it has been as of 10.15am GMT December 14) be our guests & read the November Communiqué. (Page link lest they change the link or in case you would prefer to try it yourself!) We understand their Communications department are on an away day today – no comment!

As a sort of introduction to Eleanor  Bradley we have again included her video explaining the proposals which, possibly due to its limited availability has only had 34 views on YouTube rather than the millions it deserves!

Whist their was a small increase in October (+3.9%) on last month  the year to date  figures continue to show nearly a 5% reduction. This compares we calculate (source  Hosterstats ) to dotcom’s which are running at +5.5% over last year. The dotuk trend first occurring in September of registrations being below all of the last three years ie 2011,2010 and 2009 continues. With the traditionally weakest two months underway and the disruptive direct.uk proposals staggering along we are not optimistic and fear we are on the edge!

Total domains on their register have grown to a little under 10.3 million and on a countback basis comes to 65.0 (65.0) months new registrations.

Click to enlarge

The comparative unadjusted graph is included showing the current run rate again being below that of 2009. The moving annual total is down by a further 1.3k (21.2k) on last month and at 1.99 (1.99) million is back to its June 2010 level.

Click to enlarge

Less than 2 million for the year looks like a certainty now and 1.9 million might be a struggle.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Here’s the newly appointed Chief Operating Officer & main Board Director Eleanor Bradley. Whilst we disagree with what she says, we think, she says it well!

Do yourself an enormous favour

………………………….

We are asking you to do yourself an enormous favour. It should take you less than  5 minutes (& not even that solely as an individual) and could save you thousands of pounds (or possibly more), a significant amount of stress and possibly even involvement in litigation.

The 3 W’s:

  1. WHEN? NOW (more than half of the total 99  days have now passed and counting)
  2. WHY?
  3. WHAT? Complete your details on the About You section, tick the No box in response to question 8a  and submit/send your response to Nominet.

You are responding to their “Consultation on a new .uk domain name service” as “a stakeholder1

Question 8a is “Do you agree that a new direct.uk service should adopt a phased release of domain names with the hierarchy outlined above i.e Registered Rights, Unregistered Rights, Landrush, General Availability?

We think the easiest way to respond is to complete and submit Nominet’s online form:

  • Click “Next” 6 times to get to section F. About you (40% complete)
  • Complete the appropriate details, then
  • Click “Next” 5 times to get to section L. Phased Release and Rights Management (73% complete) and
  • Tick “No” in response to question 8a then
  • Click “Next” 3 times and finally
  • Click “Submit” (100% complete)

(We urge you to retain a hard copy of your response. Print each page you have completed/want to retain.)

If you want to keep this window open simply copy & paste the following address into another tab on your browser http://www.surveygizmo.com/s3/1025946/Nominet-Consultation-On-a-New-UK-Name-Service

Click to enlarge

There are other ways to obtain & complete your response to  the consultation as explained by Nominet. Our graphic explains how we think their electronic Pdf works (e & o e) but it’s a bit involved. Final submission by email is through Adobe’s EchoSign service

Neither of these are as lengthy as our descriptions! The retention of a copy of your response is possibly the most time consuming element.

 

 

WHY?
We were going to embark on a rather lengthy analysis of all the proposals and the arguments for and against but as many others have done so, or are likely in the process of doing so, we will keep it comparatively short and attempt to cut to the quick.

We strongly believe:

  • Much wider engagement between, and communication with existing stakeholders, in particular domain name owners and internet users in this process is essential. The ramifications in particular for small businesses so far have been severely underestimated.
  • Preferential rights being given to a registered trademark holder over those of an identically named existing .co.uk (or.org.uk or .net.uk etc) domain name owner is wholly unacceptable and unjustifiable.
  • All 10.2 million.uk existing domains have a value which has already been reduced simply by the announcement of this consultation.
  • These domain name owners have a right to the identically named .uk domain name which could at least maintain (and possibly increase) their Intellectual Property/Brand’s value.

We also have concerns about Nominet’s ability to implement these proposals seamlessly.

Engagement between, and communication with stakeholders

We attended the direct.uk stakeholder roundtable meeting with Nominet in Cardiff last week (November 14). Three other stakeholders attended!

Nominet indicated that at that time NO stakeholders had expressed an interest in attending the proposed meeting in Northern Ireland.

They also told us that they had received between 300 and 400 responses to their consultation.

Nominet and their registrars have an enviable database for their stakeholder community – we believe that they all should be actively encouraged to participate and that Nominet has an obligation to contact them individually.

Domain name owners3 v’s Registered Trademark owners3

In the UK Trademark system there are 45 differing categories of trade and services so theoretically the same mark could have at least 45 registered trademarks.

When we recently searched the IPO trademark database the following number of trademarks for these words/initials/numbers were revealed:

  • Lion – 73
  • AA – 72
  • 3 – 54
  • IT – 42

So offering any rights to registered trademark owners on a simplistic name/word/initial/number only basis creates competition, and in this case competition leads to auction, and auctions lead to …..

On a simple numbers basis in 2007 there were 419,527 UK registered trademarks (we currently have a Freedom of Information (FOI) request for some more up to date numbers with the IPO). All of these are not words of course many are designs. The Eu registry is a little friendlier and on a search last week 709,032 registered trademarks existed. Of their total cumulative applications figure just over 60% have been for names/words. So we estimate that there could be around a maximum of say 700,000 (419527+709032=1128550×60%) owners of marks eligible for preferential treatment under Nominet’s proposals.

So a community of 700k of whom possibly a third or so are registered under the UK system is to be given preference over an acknowledged stakeholder community of 10.2 million domain owners. This is clearly nonsensical.

Trademarks like other assets, tangible or intangible, can be acquired and in fact traded. It is not unknown for speculative applicants to acquire on occasion multiple registered trademarks for these purposes. This has happened before and we are confident it will happen again.

Nominet

An IP partner in one of the legal 500 firms once indicated to us that Nominet’s Dispute Resolution Service was sound but otherwise well they weren’t ……..

We’re beginning to, sort of, understand.

They certainly continue with their rather strange structure. They are NOT repeat NOT a charity. Nominet UK is (as they accurately describe themselves in the direct.uk press release) a  “not-for-profit organisation”. They are a Private Limited by  Guarantee Company with no Share Capital with an exemption from using the Limited suffix

Instead of shareholders they have 2,860 members at  September 30 who have, inter alia powers to appoint a number of directors to the Nominet board. The members, who include, Webfusion Ltd, I & I Internet AG, Key-Systems Gmbh Register.com Inc, Namesco Ltd and Yell Ltd are mainly registrars and they have a somewhat complex voting system amongst themselves based on the number of  domain name registrations maintained by them. Unfair but it’s a sort of commercial block vote and elsewhere it has been calculated that eg Webfusion Ltd has over 20% of the members voting powers.

Incidentally in Cardiff  Jeff Blowers Nominet’s Director of (ie he’s not a main board Director) Legal and Policy indicated that it would be the Board who made the decision on the direct.uk proposals.

Nominet are not a large organisation. They have under 100 employees and the sheer scale of what they are proposing gives us cause for concern. Sort of reminds us of the new gTLD’s scenario!

In their proposals they indicate they want “…. to build on the sunrise process established in the .uk short domains release….” Quite so. That issue involved in total 2,837 specific domain names. There were about 700 different names (ie there were .co.uk, .org.uk, .me.uk and .net.uk third level domains on offer). We know that they wrote to a large number of registered trademark owners both at the consultation stage hmmmmm and also when the release plan was issued. Have they considered contacting the likely 700,000 trademark holders mentioned above? Could they cope with a sunrise process that might involve over 10,000,000 applicants?

The following are VERY anecdotal but:

  • On 1 October they launched their new website initially they got their own phone number wrong which we pointed out to them (we kept a screenshot somewhere)
  • There was a link in their direct.uk press release to a policy section which went to a page not found error message
  • There remain areas which still require updating
  • Look at the referencing in their online form and pdf form for this consultation G in the online form is Organisation Type which elsewhere is included in the About You section F.
  • In their online form as far as we can ascertain the only fields required to be completed are the two parts of section G Organisation Type.

Bottom lining it we think there could be disruption in the process proposed.

1 “…… this consultation is an opportunity for stakeholders including registrants, registrars internet users business and industry, public authorities civil society, consumer organisations and any others….”

2 Nominet in their October Communique indicated that there were 10,243,649 domain names on their register

3 We that is The Information I Ltd (who operate this site) are both the domain name owners of I.co.uk and I.org.uk as well as owning a registered Trademark for the letter “I” which we originally registered in 2001.

Dire dotuk registrations in third quarter and worsening

Click to enlarge

 Nominet have ceased publishing on a regular monthly basis their detailed .uk domain registration figures. We are surprised and disappointed by this reduced transparency which, to an extent appears to be mirrored in their somewhat low key approach to promoting their Consultation on their, ahem, radical proposals for changes to the .uk domainspace. This we believe effects over 40 million internet users and 10 million .uk domain registrants of which around 4 million are businesses. We shall return to this subject later this week. We are opposed to the proposals in their current format.

Nominet publishes, a “Communiqué” after Board Meetings which is now our (somewhat irregular) source for the total monthly registrations and the number on their register. This is the October 2012 Communiqué Pdf which was published on their site in the News Section last week.

Click to....

Whist there was a modest increase in September (+2.4%) the year-on-year and quarterly figures are dire. The y-o-y are down a staggering 11.9% and the quarterly figures show a steep decline of  -7.7%  following the virtual flatlining in quarter 2 (+1.0%). Year to date is now down 5% compared to 2.2% in quarter 2. The outlook is far from rosy due to their Direct.uk proposals which at best will make many delay or even choose an alternative domain source.

Domains on their register have grown a little to over 10.2 million and on a countback basis comes to 65.0 (64.7) months new registrations.

Click to.....

The comparative unadjusted graph is included and shows the current run rate now being below that of 2009. The moving annual total is down by a further 21.2k (22.3k) on last month and is now less than 2 million at 1.99 (2.03) million for the first time since June 2010.

2 million for the year looks like a forlorn hope now and it could be back to barely 1.9 million if the last quarter is 10% down on last years very disappointing 468k registrations.

Click to ....

Nominet create a new gTLD & disrupt the .UK internet

Nominet, on it’s new shiny website has this morning announced that it is considering, and commencing a consultation on, the potential introduction of the top level domain .UK on its own (ie no.co .org etc required). Its calling the service “direct .uk” and (initially at least) limiting it to “businesses”.

Our initial reaction is that this:

  • pidgeons the cat the Puts amongst
  • box Pandora’s Opens
  • of bag cat the the Lets out

Rearrange etc etc and add to, as you please.

Very briefly and no doubt inadequately we think the proposed “direct .uk” service comprises:

  • “”Businesses” being allowed to buy from registrars at an increased price the second level domain .uk eg anyname.uk (Nominet currently charge £5 for 2 years, sort of wholesale, for .co.uk type domains to registrars and envisage a comparable figure of sub £20 per annum for this service)
  • Third level domains can be set up by the acquiring business but may not be resold and there will be certain restrictions (eg no .co or .org etc etc but we guess .London.London.uk or .Nominet.Domain.uk might be allowed)
  • There will be a ”light touch” (in our view) regulation requiring a UK physical address to be provided in connection with registration.
  • There will be certain security features bundled with the domains acquisition ( eg monitoring of malware and viruses will be regularly undertaken and reported to owners + site digital signing arrangements).
  • A trusted “kitemark” will be provided for inclusion on .uk sites.
  • If  the service goes ahead there will be an initial application process recognising pre-existing registered rights eg trademarks (phase 1), then unregistered rights (which would include existing .co.uk .org.uk domain ownership), (Phase 2) followed by a landrush phase (3) after which there would be general availability.
  • A process similar to that used for Nominet’s short domain release some 18 months ago would apply.
  • Multiple qualifying applications at the first 2 phases would again go to auction.

To view their proposals and respond to the consultation (7 January 2013 latest) Nominet suggest:

“You can respond to the consultation either by completing an online form, by downloading the consultation and emailing your comments to direct@nominet.org.uk  or by requesting a hard copy of the consultation from direct@nominet.org.uk

Nominet describes itself (Who is Nominet?) in the consultation document in the FAQ section as follows:

“Nominet is the private, not-for-profit business internet business that is best known for running the .uk registry which comprises more than 10 million domain names. We provide a public service for the .uk namespace on behalf of the UK internet community and are commited to consulting with our stakeholders on any change in policy.”

The new website in the What we do area say “As a public purpose internet company, we have been running the .uk, country code Top Level Domain name registry since 1996 and will be running the .wales and .cymru domains from 2013. This includes protecting, promoting and supporting the online presence of more than 10 million domain names.”

Nominet UK is  a company limited by guarantee,  and describes itself in the Who we are section as follows “Our structure reflects the fact that as a private, public purpose company, we have members rather than shareholders. Any organisation with an interest in the internet can become a member by paying a subscription fee.” The new website gives a, we think partial, listing of the members (ie we couldn’t count the 2,800 mentioned elsewhere).

So lots of “business” in their first definition but at the end of the day, in our view, it is not a commercial business. (eg likely many commercial concerns would have consistency of description in its externally published communications  “What we do” “Who is Nominet” etc etc)!

Most, if not all, of the customers of the proposed “direct .uk” service will be businesses.

In our experience most, particularly large, or monopolistic businesses will have thought through in depth, any possible major policy changes before potentially disrupting its customer base. If  transparent they might even commission and publish external research, advice and opinions received on the proposed change.

We think Nominet may have quite a bit of persuading to do to get overwhelming support for their proposals from its main customer base – UK business!

We leave you with their video. (Link only – apparently per Nominet “….. our website does not allow us to share or embed videos with other sites” UPDATE October 3.

Nominet have, following our request “arranged for the video to be posted on YouTube”. Thanks

We encourage everyone to give it as wide a circulation as possible. This is the YouTube link http://youtu.be/Q6Gu2cQRVpk

The Next Big Thing likely comes from California, New York, Massachusetts or Washington

Click to enlarge

The Wall Street Journal have just published their 2012 “Ranking the Top 50 Start Ups

They, sort of, headline the article, “The Next Big Thing” which is, in our view nearer the mark as some of the companies started up in the last century and in their top ten the latest one was founded in 2007!

Their inclusion criteria are:

“To be eligible for the ranking—compiled by research firm VentureSource, which like The Wall Street Journal is owned by News Corp.—companies must be based in the U.S., have received an equity round of financing in the past three years and be valued at less than $1 billion, as the aim is to identify lesser-known start-ups. More than 5,900 candidates were considered.”

As per their infographic of the top ten 10% of the companies are in the Health Care sector. If a comparable UK listing was compiled we doubt if this sector would be as prominent.

We also noted the following numbers breakdown by state:

1   California 37

2   New York 4

3    Massachusetts 3

4   Washington 2

5= Colorado 1

5=  New Jersey 1

5=  North Carolina 1

5=  Texas 1

California is remarkable but understandable and possibly New York is a population #’s scenario with Massachusetts linked with their Institute of Technology. Washington we find interesting with one company Donuts Inc (a new domain registry company) based in Bellvue and the other Cheezeburger being based in Seattle. Both Amazon (AWS Global Start-up Challenge) and Microsoft (Bing Fund)  as we have mentioned before fund directly and indirectly new startup ventures and are based in Seattle and Bellvue. Whilst there may be no direct link we doubt if this is an entire coincidence.

In our list in addition to their top ten we’ve selected our personal choice of “interesting” companies.

Employees State Founded Funding WSJ Category
$ million
1 Genband Inc 1700 TX 1999 500 Information Technology
2 Xirrus Inc 170 CA 2004 100 Information Technology
3 Tabula Inc 120 CA 2003 215 Information Technology
4 Prosper Marketplace 70 CA 2005 81 Business & Financial Services
5 SpiderCloudWirelessInc 95 CA 2007 106 Information Technology
6 Docusign Inc 275 CA 2005 123 Business & Financial Services
7 Glaukos Corp 57 CA 2001 126 Health Care
8 Neuropace Inc 90 CA 1997 180 Health Care
9 10Gen Inc 155 NY 2007 74 Information Technology
10 Glam Media 280 CA 2004 135 Consumer Servicess
12 Plexxi n/a MA 2010 46 Information Technology
14 Donuts Inc n/a WA 2011 100 Business & Financial Services
16 Uber Media n/a CA 2010 27 Consumer Services
17 Etsy n/a NY 2005 91 Consumer Services
19 RockMelt Inc n/a CA 2009 40 Information Technology
21 Machinima Inc n/a CA 2005 50 Consumer Services
22 Appia Inc n/a NC 2008 28 Information Technology
23 Boku Inc n/a CA 2009 73 Information Technology
25 SmartDrive SystemsInc n/a CA 2004 100 Business & Financial Services
28 Cheezburger n/a WA 2007 32 Consumer Services
30 Vidyo Inc n/a NJ 2005 99 Information Technology
34 Chegg Inc n/a CA 2005 211 Consumer Services

 

For the top ten the WSJ provides mini bios for each company (difficulty in finding a direct link so – scroll down on main article to” The Top 10 Venture-Backed Companies” picture & click on that!) . The one fun fact we sort of smiled at was Xirrus’s “The company’s conference rooms have names from Star Trek like the Holodeck, the Transporter Room and Warp Core. “ Whilst it didn’t raise a smile here we thought 10Gen Inc’s was incredibly ….. sensible “Everyone at 10gen, regardless of title, does customer support, including the CEO, CTO and engineers.”

Of our interesting additions Cheezburger generates wide public acclaim for its “fun” but we favour  Donuts Inc ( if the new gTLD’s take off so could they) RockMelt (a sort of Social Media browser {or Wowser} as they describe it),  Machinima for all you gamers, and Vidyo (not only for the name but also its enterprise video conferencing).

As ever we will leave you with a video – this go round it’s the WSJ’s, rather hesitant interviewee Emily Maltby explaining it all.
………

Weak August dot-UK registrations show over 10% decline

Click to enlarge

Nominet  have  published their dot-uk August registration figures.

August 2012 dot-uk registrations (#’s)
All dot-uk dot-co dot-org dot-ltd dot-plc dot-net dot-sch dot-me
New 147,633 138,991 7,162 84 0 5 23 1,368
On register 10,200,916
Source: Nominet .

.

The rate of decline is accelerating this month, with for example, the year-on-year decline (both adjusted and unadjusted) showing a reduction of 13.1%. Dot-co-dot-uk registrations (unadjusted) are down by over 9% on last months figure and all dot-uk registrations (unadjusted) are back to their August 2009 level.

I.co.uk August 2012 dot-uk new registrations
Thousands Aug ’12 Growth Growth Jul ’12 Aug ’11
    # prior mth yr-on-yr   # #
Month
* Adjusted 154.6 -4.3% -13.1% 161.6 178.0
Unadjusted 147.6 -8.4% -13.1% 161.2 169.9
2012 to date
* Adjusted 1,339.2     n/a -4.2%   n/a 1,397.5
Unadjusted 1,366.8     n/a -4.2%   n/a 1,426.9
Sources: Nominet / I.co.uk
*For seasonality – experimental statistics

.

The *adjusted registrations show a decrease of -4.3% (-2.1%) on last month and -13.1% (-6.8%) on August 2011. Cumulatively, again on an adjusted basis, they show a decrease of -4.2% (-2.9%) with this decline also accelerating.

Total domains on their register have grown a little to over 10.2 million and on a countback basis come to 64.7 (64.8) months new registrations. Perhaps organisations/individuals are using existing domains rather than registering new ones.

Click to enlarge

The comparative unadjusted graph is included again as is the moving annual total  which is down by 22.3k (11.8k) on last month and at 2.01 (2.03) million is at its lowest since July 2010 (August 2010).

Click to enlarge

Our forecast of over 2 million for 2012 is likely unachievable and we could be back to barely 1.9 million.

Perhaps in the UK’s drive for economic expansion some, not necessarily publicly funded, incentives for domain registration could be introduced eg perhaps a specialised set of FSA/Bank of England regulatory rules for crowd sourced funding. A process simplification rather than any relaxation ie a positive rather than a light touch might be in order!

 

 

*Seasonality adjustment – As with the Office for National Statistics’ (ONS) qualification, our figures are (very) experimental – “Experimental statistics are those which are in the testing phase and are not yet fully developed. The main reason why the statistics are designated as experimental is that the methods and data sources are still being improved”. We would in our case likely go further with our caveats!